Faster power switches for aircraft safety: Going from milliseconds to microseconds

In a few milliseconds, electrical arcing in aircraft wiring can release thousands of joules of energy. This is enough to ignite wire insulation, pierce hydraulic lines, and compromise critical flight-control subsystems.

The aviation industry urgently needs reliable and mitigation measures. Going on decades now, academic and commercial research on the subject continues because arc detection is such a difficult problem to solve.

Sometimes arc currents are indistinguishable from normal operating currents. Although arc fault circuit interrupters are commercially available for systems, they are imperfect and prone to missed detections and nuisance tripping. Furthermore, AC arcing is a different phenomenon than DC arcing: DC detectors do not benefit from the repeated arc ignitions that arise from AC zero-current crossings.

Any detection solution will rely on fast circuit-breaking action to extinguish faults. For high-voltage, high-current, DC power systems, a new generation of solid-state power switches is now available to meet that need.

Conventional approach to power switching

The principal power-distribution switching elements in an are, conventionally, some form of mechanical switch. Generally, these are circuit breakers or contactors with over-current trip functionality. These devices are engineered to be high-performance and highly reliable. Nevertheless, even with design features to minimize turnoff time, a high current turnoff may last 30 to 50 milliseconds, an effective eternity in which an arc fault can precipitate a major failure.

This turnoff duration is dominated by the lifetime of another type of arcing – drawn arcing established between separating contacts. To minimize this event, high current electromechanical switches often include blowout coils, or blowout permanent magnets (exclusively for ), which accelerate arc quenching. These features exploit the Lorentz force, acting on charged particles moving with velocity through a . Arcs are pushed out to the edge of the contacts, then stretched until they extinguish.

While a stronger magnetic field will push the arc out faster, practical devices must contend with size and weight constraints. The larger the current, and the larger the loop inductance, the harder it will be to quench drawn arcs quickly.

Solid-state switching for faster arcing mitigation

Because of these challenges, certain applications benefit from arcless solid-state switching or arcless hybrid switching. Instead of opening a contact gap, a uses to throttle current. This cutoff can happen very quickly – as brief as microseconds – minimizing damage from major arc-faults.
This speed comes with some important penalties:

  • First, the cost. High-performance transistors are expensive, especially cutting-edge high-temperature, low on-resistance die made from silicon carbide. Further, some complex electronics are required for bias supplies and gate driving, at a minimum. These factors push the starting cost of a solid-state solution beyond that of a comparable electromechanical one.
  • Second, the on- and off-resistances of solid-state devices are inferior to electromechanical ones. Paralleling more transistors will improve the on-resistance but will reduce the off-resistance (increasing leakage). On-state and switching losses can be significant; they also mandate external cooling to prevent transistors from reaching their maximum allowable junction temperatures (Tj,max). Transistors operating near or beyond Tj,max are likely to fail. Generated heat must be evacuated efficiently, requiring expensive packaging materials, which further drive up costs.

By way of comparison, a 125 A DC from has a nominal on-resistance of 4 milliohms, producing 63 watts of dissipation. A comparable electromechanical contactor might have a contact resistance of 0.5 milliohms, yielding only 8 watts of contact loss, 14 watts if you include coil power. While 63 watts is impressively low for a solid-state switch at these breakdown voltage and current levels, it is still significantly larger than the loss of a conventional contactor. This is proving to be an acceptable tradeoff for customers who recognize that a 30-microsecond arc elimination will cause significantly less damage than a 30-millisecond one.

TE Connectivity’s compact 125A 270VDC solid state power controller.

A best-of-both-worlds approach combines the two solutions. A hybrid contactor electrically straps solid-state transistors across the contacts of a standard contactor. The transistors are switched on during state transitions, effectively absorbing what would have been contact arcing energy. During a turn-on, this means no arcing during contact bounce, further extending contact life. When fully on, the on-resistance is simply the contact resistance. When fully off, the leakage is defined by the contacts and not by the transistors.

A well-designed hybrid contactor can switch faster than a conventional one, and without the cooling required by a solid-state-only solution. A hybrid part can also be smaller for the same rating, with no need for blowout hardware, and with smaller armature spring and drive coil. The primary disadvantage is that the cost for a hybrid contactor will be driven by its solid-state content.

With ever-increasing power requirements, aircraft need a new generation of faster, higher-performance power switches. As a result, solid-state devices are becoming key elements in the modernization of military and commercial aerospace .